AI
Industrial DevOps

The AI Integrity Paradox: Securing Your Exploding OT Attack Surface

Published on
September 3, 2025

The modern factory is a sprawling digital ecosystem. The average enterprise now manages over 2,000 PLCs and 2,100 associated devices like sensors and drives. This hyper-connectivity is unlocking incredible efficiency, but it has also created an "exploding attack surface" that is expanding at an unmanageable rate.

In this new reality, manual security oversight is obsolete. The sheer scale is why 40% of organizations cite data security and privacy as their top concern in adopting AI. Yet, they are also demanding it as their first line of defense.

  1. The Demand for an AI Guardian

It’s impossible for human teams to manually monitor every code change across thousands of devices from an average of six different PLC vendors. This is why the most-valued AI feature (49%) isn't about efficiency—it's a plea for control: AI-driven version control with change detection and anomaly alerts. Teams need an intelligent, automated guardian that can spot a single unauthorized change or a new vulnerability across a complex, multi-vendor landscape.

  1. The Integrity & Confidence Paradoxes

Herein lies a fascinating contradiction. While teams are demanding AI for defense, they are also deeply concerned about the reliability of its algorithms (37%) and have a lack of trust in its models (26%). Yet, they are simultaneously asking AI to perform mission-critical tasks like optimizing PLC logic (39%). This isn't a rejection of AI; it's an urgent demand for trustworthy AI that can master the fragmented reality of the modern plant floor.

This is compounded by a "Confidence Paradox." A remarkable 82% of organizations are highly confident in both the accuracy of their asset inventories and their ability to recover from a cyberattack using backups. But is this confidence justified when IT/OT collaboration on security is rated as "very effective" by only half of organizations?

  1. The Unifying Mandate

The challenges of scale, complexity, and trust all point to one conclusion. A resounding 87% of leaders state it is very or extremely important to integrate OT cybersecurity tools with industrial code management tools.

This demand for integration is the very definition of Industrial DevOps. It's the recognition that a secure plant floor is only possible when security policies are embedded in the tools that manage code. The industry is no longer just identifying problems; it is explicitly asking for the solution.

Download the full report now by clicking here.

So, is the industry answering this call? In our next post, we'll reveal the data showing that Industrial DevOps has officially reached a market tipping point.